Approaches for Aggregating Preferences in Participatory Forest Planning - An Experimental Study
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Approaches for Aggregating Preferences in Participatory Forest Planning - An Experimental Study
Many forest planning situations are complex; multiple criteria of different natures have to be considered and several stakeholders or social groups may be involved. An approach that is increasingly used in these complex situations is the combination of multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and participatory planning. A crucial part of MCDA processes involving more than one decision maker i...
متن کاملApproaches for aggregating preferences in participatory forest planning: An experiment with university students
Traditionally, the main focus of forest management planning has been the production of timber. However, forests are today regarded as a source for a wide range of commodities and services, such as biodiversity and recreation to name a few. This results in planning situations that often involve several stakeholders or social groups where a multiplicity of criteria of very different natures must ...
متن کاملDecision Support for Participatory Forest Planning Using AHP and TOPSIS
Long-term forest management planning often involves several stakeholders with conflicting objectives, creating a complex decision process. Multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) presents a promising framework for finding solutions in terms of suitable trade-offs among the objectives. However, many of the MCDA methods that have been implemented in forest management planning can only be used ...
متن کاملAggregating Partially Ordered Preferences
Preferences are not always expressible via complete linear orders: sometimes it is more natural to allow for the presence of incomparable outcomes. This may hold both in the agents’ preference ordering and in the social order. In this article, we consider this scenario and study what properties it may have. In particular, we show that, despite the added expressivity and ability to resolve confl...
متن کاملAggregating Moral Preferences
Preference-aggregation problems arise in various contexts. One such context, little explored by social choice theorists, is metaethical. ‘Idealadvisor’ accounts, which have played a major role in metaethics, propose that moral facts are constituted by the idealized preferences of a community of advisors. Such accounts give rise to a preference-aggregation problem: namely, aggregating the adviso...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Open Forest Science Journal
سال: 2012
ISSN: 1874-3986
DOI: 10.2174/1874398601205010023